Which solution to choose for business: step-by-step algorithm

[sadiksojib35]

You encounter a simple signature when you enter a code from an SMS, login and password to log in to a website, or with two-factor authentication. Enhanced signatures are created using a cryptographic information protection system; they can be used to sign more important documents. UKEP is equivalent to a handwritten signature and is used for the most important documents that are under state control: for example, to register real estate in Rosreestr or when concluding a loan or mortgage agreement. And to use honduras telegram database UNEP, users must sign a corresponding agreement recognizing it as legally significant - this is its main difference from UKEP. UNEP is the most popular in KEDO services: it is cheaper than UKEP. EDI services use both NEP and KEP. Outside of EDI and KEDO services, all three types of EP can be used.

The question arises: since an electronic signature exists both as a separate entity and as part of the EDI and KEDO services, isn't it easier to issue an EP for any document flow and calm down? In short, it is possible, but not always. For example, if you work with invoices, you cannot do without EDI for exchanging documents with legal entities.

Companies that work without invoices may not use EDI services. But in this case, you should carefully consider the choice of an electronic signature service: not all of them provide the ability to not only sign documents, but also conveniently exchange them with the counterparty, store the history of signatures and the archive of the documents themselves. But if the service has all of the above, and you do not have VAT, then you can work without EDI/KEDO.

To summarize: EDI exists for the exchange of documents between two legal entities, KEDO - between companies and employees, and EP will always be part of the EDI and KEDO services, but can also be used outside of them.