Interestingly, a little earlier the state took

Buy owner data from various industry. Like home owner, car owner, business owner etc type owner contact details
Post Reply
sumaiyakhatun27
Posts: 153
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2024 6:38 am

Interestingly, a little earlier the state took

Post by sumaiyakhatun27 »

Avito's side in a dispute with CIAN over copying ads for the sale of real estate. And last year, the Regnum news agency complained about Yandex because of the biased formation of the top news sources. Also without result. It is quite possible that further in the situation with the collective complaint of Avito and the company the same thing will happen as in other similar situations.


That is, nothing. Lawyer Ruslan Alimov, commenting for Kommersant on germany email list the non-recognition of Yandex as a monopolist, notes the state's "more than liberal" attitude towards the Internet giant. And he recalls how in 2017 the FAS protected Yandex's interests and fined its main competitor, Google, 438 million rubles. And at the same time, it banned requiring Android users to use the Google Chrome browser and the Google Play app store.


Antitrust expert Maria Kot does not support the opinion about the state's protectionism in relation to Yandex. In her opinion , it is possible to draw conclusions about whether search engines violate or do not violate monopoly legislation only by conducting a comprehensive study of the market and assessing the impact of their actions on competition. We asked Alexey Pashkov, a partner at the Tolpegin and Partners law firm, about the prospects of an online service group appealing to the FAS.
Post Reply